Ohio Woman Prosecuted for Corpse Abuse After Miscarriage Incident

Ohio Woman Prosecuted for Corpse Abuse Following Miscarriage

Brittany Watts, a resident of Warren, Ohio, was charged with the abuse of a corpse after experiencing a miscarriage at home. This case has sparked discussions about its legal, medical, and social implications.

What Happened to Brittany Watts?

During her 21st week of gestation, Brittany Watts experienced a tragic incident. Due to complications, she was advised to undergo an induction at St. Joseph Warren Hospital as the fetus was nonviable. However, Watts left the hospital without undergoing the procedure. A few days later, she suffered a miscarriage at home and then attempted to dispose of the remains, leading to her arrest on charges of abusing a corpse.

Ohio passed a law in 1996 that prohibits the offensive treatment of human corpses. Questions have arisen regarding the definition of a corpse in this particular case, particularly whether a nonviable embryo can be deemed a corpse under the existing legislation.

Why is Brittany Watts’s Case Being Prosecuted?

Experts speculate that Watts may have been charged for misinterpreting the law, while others suggest that social or political pressures played a role in the decision to proceed with the prosecution. The circumstances surrounding her case warrant a thorough examination of the legal and ethical factors involved.

The Broader Implications for Women’s Health and Rights

Brittany Watts’s case raises significant issues concerning women’s reproductive rights and healthcare during pregnancy-related conditions, as well as the legal recognition of fetal personhood. Recent changes in Ohio’s laws pertaining to abortion and reproductive healthcare provide the backdrop against which Watts’s case unfolds.

Understanding Ohio’s legal stance and the broader implications for women’s health and rights is crucial in comprehending the significance of this case. It is essential to engage in thoughtful discussions and consider the multiple perspectives surrounding the topic, ensuring that the rights and well-being of women are protected and upheld.


Q: Was Brittany Watts aware of Ohio’s laws regarding the treatment of fetal remains?

A: It is unclear whether Brittany Watts was fully aware of Ohio’s laws regarding the treatment of fetal remains. Further investigation is required to determine her level of knowledge and understanding.

Q: Are there any exemptions or exceptions in Ohio’s law for cases of miscarriage?

A: Ohio’s law regarding the treatment of fetal remains does not explicitly mention exemptions or exceptions for cases of miscarriage. However, the interpretation and application of the law may vary.

Q: How does Brittany Watts’s case impact the broader conversation on reproductive rights?

A: Brittany Watts’s case adds to the ongoing discussion on reproductive rights and highlights the complexities surrounding laws and regulations related to pregnancy and fetal personhood.


The case of Brittany Watts has garnered attention for its unique circumstances and the legal and ethical questions it raises. It has shed light on the complexities of reproductive rights, healthcare, and the legal recognition of fetal personhood. Engaging in thoughtful discussions and considering the multiple perspectives surrounding the topic is crucial to ensure that the rights and well-being of women are protected and upheld.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *